8 June 2026
This Week’s Cost Intelligence
The index eased to 123.98 this week, down 1.36%, its second small fall in a row. Nothing dramatic sits behind it: most of the metals simply gave back a little ground at once, so this reads as the market settling rather than turning. With prices drifting down, the value this week is in the inputs that have softened, not in chasing the one material still going up.
Almost everything eased back. Platinum fell hardest at 8.91%, but the more useful moves for site budgets were in the base metals, polyvinyl down 4.97%, copper 4.23%, nickel 3.70% and aluminium 3.58%, which feed electrical, mechanical and cladding works. Rebar slipped 1.76% and cold-rolled coil held flat, so the structural frame is steady to slightly lower. That makes this a sensible week to commit MEP, facade and rebar scopes. The one exception is bitumen, up 2.00% and the only clear riser, so road, paving and waterproofing packages still need early cover.
Two things work against the softer materials. Freight is still climbing, with container rates up hardest, so a lower mill price does not always mean a lower delivered price, price every imported line on landed cost. Currency, though, helps a little: the Dirham and Riyal firmed against every tracked currency this week, with the Australian Dollar, Singapore Dollar and Euro easing most, which trims a small amount off foreign-currency imports across the board. The US Dollar stays pegged and does not move against either.
STONEHAVEN COST INDEX HEADLINE KPIS
SCI Issue 19 · 01 June–08 June 2026
Cost Index 0.00 As of 08 June 2026
Index 0.00 Sub-index reading
Source: Stonehaven Cost Index Issue 19 · 01 June–08 June 2026
SCI VS BASELINE — 33-WEEK TREND
Stonehaven Cost Index, weekly. Baseline 01 Sep 2025 = 100.
Source: Stonehaven Cost Index Issue 19 · 01 June–08 June 2026
SCI WEEK-ON-WEEK % CHANGE
Weekly movement of the Stonehaven Cost Index — momentum over the last 33 readings.
Source: Stonehaven Cost Index Issue 19 · 01 June–08 June 2026
THIS WEEK'S DRIVER NOTE
Commercial commentary on the week's price action from Stonehaven's Managing Director.
The index slips to 123.98, down 1.36%. That is two soft weeks in a row. Nothing here points to a real downturn.
Most metals eased back together. Bitumen is the top riser again, up 2.00% for a second week. Platinum fell the hardest.
Steel and the structural frame held firm. Bitumen has now led two weeks running, so cover that scope early. Use the softer metals to lock MEP and façade prices now.
Source: Stonehaven Cost Index Issue 19 · 01 June–08 June 2026
MATERIAL MOVEMENT THIS WEEK
Spot prices and % change across weekly, monthly, year-to-date and year-on-year windows.
← Swipe or tap arrows to see more →
Source: Stonehaven Cost Index Issue 19 · 01 June–08 June 2026
To view the price fluctuations in detail, please download our latest dataset below.
CUMULATIVE % CHANGE VS BASELINE BY MATERIAL
How far each tracked input has moved since 01 Sep 2025 = 100.
Source: Stonehaven Cost Index Issue 19 · 01 June–08 June 2026
MARKET MATERIAL WATCHLIST
Three materials to monitor closely over the coming week.
Source: Stonehaven Cost Index Issue 19 · 01 June–08 June 2026
Bitumen – Strong Uptrend (▲) Forecast:
Firm prices look set to hold near term. Bitumen added 2.00% this week, making it the top riser for a second cycle running, and it now sits 7.99% higher on the month and 58.84% up year to date. The weekly pace has cooled from last cycle, but direction and momentum are unchanged.
Price roads, waterproofing and membrane packages with explicit headroom. Where bitumen exposure runs above 8% of package cost, secure forward cover rather than buying spot.
Platinum – Sharp Downtrend (▼) Forecast:
Platinum fell 8.91% this week, the steepest move in the basket, extending a 14.70% monthly slide that now leaves it 18.75% below where it began the year. It is the one outright bearish line this cycle.
Direct construction exposure is limited, so the effect on package cost is small. Read it as a market sentiment signal rather than a budget line, and defer any platinum-linked specialist items while the slide continues.
Non-Ferrous Metals – Broad Pullback (▼) Forecast:
Copper, nickel and aluminium gave back ground together this week, each easing between 3.5% and 4.5%. The complex turned as a block, reversing several weeks of firmness and signalling a genuine pause in demand rather than isolated noise.
For MEP, electrical and structural buyers this opens a short buying window. Price or lock wiring, switchgear and structural metal packages while the softer levels hold, rather than waiting for a rebound.
THIS WEEK'S MARKET MOVERS — WOW %
Material-by-material price movement over the week ending 08 June 2026.
Source: Stonehaven Cost Index Issue 19 · 01 June–08 June 2026
AVERAGE SCI FLUCTUATION
VS MATERIAL PRICES
Click a tab to switch material — Oil (Diesel), Steel-rebar or Aluminium. Bars show monthly average material price (left axis); line shows Avg. SCI (right axis).
Source: Stonehaven Cost Index Issue 19 · 01 June–08 June 2026
SCI SUB-INDEX TRENDS
Click a tab to view that index — Materials, Labour or Plant.
Source: Stonehaven Cost Index Issue 19 · 01 June–08 June 2026
Steel as the Cost Spine of the GCC Construction Programme
Steel is the single largest line in the Stonehaven materials basket, carrying an 18% weight that spans reinforcing bar, structural sections, hot-rolled coil and cold-rolled coil. It runs through every frame, slab, core, podium and bridge deck in the GCC pipeline, so its direction tends to set the tone for the whole index. When steel moves, the structural budget moves with it.
Demand-side fundamentals stay firm. The region's residential, commercial, data-centre and transport-infrastructure programmes are all steel-heavy, and rebar fixing and fabrication remain among the most labour and material sensitive packages on any job. That keeps a floor under consumption even in a softer pricing week like this one.
Steel Products in the GCC Basket
Four product groups account for most steel consumption on a typical GCC site, and they did not all move the same way this week:
1. Reinforcing Bar (Rebar) – the high-volume long product behind substructure and frame works. It eased 1.76% this week to 463.12 USD/t on softer Chinese futures, giving rebar-heavy packages a small tailwind.
2. Structural Sections – beams, columns and hollow sections for steel-framed and composite structures, priced off the same offshore base as rebar and tracking it closely.
3. Hot-Rolled Coil (HRC) – the feedstock for decking, ductwork and fabricated sheet. It firmed 0.34% this week to 1,192.05 USD/t on tighter regional sheet availability, the opposite direction to rebar.
4. Cold-Rolled Coil (CRC) – used in coated and finished sheet applications. It was broadly flat at 593.03 USD/t this week and is the most data-sensitive line in the group.
Regional Supply Dynamics and Their Impact on GCC Steel Pricing
Gulf steel pricing is anchored offshore. The marginal tonne is set by Chinese mill output and the SHFE futures curve, converted through a daily USD/CNY rate and then landed via Red Sea and Arabian Gulf freight. Chinese output has stayed high while domestic demand has been soft, holding the export floor low and feeding this week's easing in rebar.
The divergence against the September 2025 baseline is stark. Rebar now sits at an index of 108.3 while HRC stands at 149.9, a reminder that flat and fabricated products have re-rated far harder than long products over the past nine months. Year on year the same gap shows: HRC is up 35.3% and CRC 44.7%, against rebar at 12.6%. Cold-rolled coil is held at 593.03 USD/t for series continuity this cycle, as the primary China source was unavailable; alternative export-basis sources place it in the high-400s to mid-500s USD/t, confirming a soft bias.
A medium-term risk sits in policy. From January 2026 China introduced an export quota system covering more than one hundred steel and steel-containing products, including hot and cold rolled coil, rebar, billet and slab. The measure could narrow export availability even while mill-gate prices stay soft, a combination that would lift landed Gulf prices through scarcity rather than through the futures curve.
Freight is the swing factor. Dry-bulk eased this week, with the Baltic Dry Index down 7.48% to 2,981 points, trimming the landed premium on bulk long steel, but the Global Container Freight Index rose 6.02% to 2,726.48, and any renewed Red Sea or Suez disruption would lift the delivered cost of coil and sections quickly. The practical read for estimators: time rebar and structural sections opportunistically into the soft patch, but secure forward cover on coil, coated and containerised steel where the structural trend and freight exposure both point up.
CURRENCY & INFLATION LENS
AED VS KEY TRADING CURRENCIES
UAE Dirham vs key trading currencies, weekly movement and trailing averages.
← Swipe or tap arrows to see more →
Source: Stonehaven Cost Index Issue 19 · 01 June–08 June 2026
AED FX EXPOSURE — WOW % CHANGE
Weekly currency moves against AED across the eight tracked import-pricing pairs.
Source: Stonehaven Cost Index Issue 19 · 01 June–08 June 2026
SAR VS KEY TRADING CURRENCIES
Saudi Riyal vs key trading currencies, weekly movement and trailing averages.
← Swipe or tap arrows to see more →
Source: Stonehaven Cost Index Issue 19 · 01 June–08 June 2026
SAR FX EXPOSURE — WOW % CHANGE
Weekly currency moves against SAR across the eight tracked import-pricing pairs.
Source: Stonehaven Cost Index Issue 19 · 01 June–08 June 2026
Currency Impact on This Week's Costs
Here is the short version. This week the Dirham and the Riyal got a little stronger against everything we follow, so your money now stretches that bit further on anything bought abroad. Every imported package priced in a foreign currency is a touch cheaper than it was last week, and the nice part is that nothing went the other way. The Dollar, of course, did not budge, it is tied to both currencies by law, so a job in the UAE and a job in Saudi Arabia are in exactly the same boat.
If you line the currencies up by how much they eased against the Dirham and Riyal, it looks like this:
1. Australian Dollar - down 1.89%, the biggest drop, so this is where you save most
2. Singapore Dollar - down 1.05%
3. Euro - down 1.00%, which takes a little off European steel and facade work
4. British Pound - down 0.83%, so UK consultants and facade systems come in cheaper
5. Japanese Yen - down 0.61%
6. Indian Rupee - down 0.33%
7. Chinese Yuan - down 0.23%. It moved the least, but keep an eye on it anyway, because it is the one that feeds into China-sourced bitumen, polyvinyl, rebar and cold-rolled coil
8. US Dollar - flat, as always, it is pegged
What This Means for Construction
Picture it as a small, even discount sitting underneath every imported package this week. It is not really a story about any one country, it just depends on what currency you happen to be paying in.
So if you are buying in Australian Dollars, Singapore Dollars or Euros, the saving is big enough to be worth nudging a new order into this week, European steel and facade scopes being the obvious one. If you are paying in Pounds, Yen, Rupees or Yuan, just take it as a quiet bonus, drop it into your next quote and move on, it is too small to start reshuffling suppliers over. The Yuan is the one worth a second glance even though it barely moved, simply because it quietly trims the landed cost of the China-linked materials the index follows.
Either way the advice is the same: let the saving fall onto new orders, and leave anything already signed exactly where it is. Nothing here is big enough to justify reopening a contract.
The Practical Read
A good week for buyers, but a gentle one. Everything imported is a little cheaper, with the Australian Dollar, Singapore Dollar and Euro leading the way. It is a modest gain and it could slip back if the Dollar softens, so take it on new orders without leaning on it too hard. And since the Dirham and Riyal are joined at the hip through the Dollar, there is no advantage either side of the border, a UAE project and a Saudi one sit in precisely the same place.
GLOBAL INPUTS & FREIGHT BENCHMARKS
Logistics & freight — construction cost multipliers.
← Swipe or tap arrows to see more →
Source: Stonehaven Cost Index Issue 19 · 01 June–08 June 2026 · *Data as of 08 June 2026
FREIGHT & SHIPPING INDICES
Click a tab to view that index — Baltic Dry, Capesize, Panamax or Container. Monthly readings.
Source: Stonehaven Cost Index Issue 19 · 01 June–08 June 2026
Stonehaven Procurement Strategy Index (SPSI)
The SPSI scores procurement risk in one number, built from three inputs:
-
Market Volatility (MVEI) – the size of material price moves
-
-
Import & Currency Exposure (ICEI) – the cost effect of currency swings on imports
-
-
Energy & Logistics (ELEI) – the pressure from fuel and freight
Each runs 1 to 4, from calm to high risk. The combined score uses the same scale:
-
Below 1.5: Low risk – steady market, minimal movement
-
-
1.5 to 2.25: Mild risk – small moves, light monitoring
-
-
2.25 to 3.25: Moderate risk – clear movement, targeted action
-
-
Above 3.25: High risk – unsettled market, immediate review
-
Current Position (08 June): SPSI = 2.25 (Mild Risk, top of band)
-
MVEI = 2 → prices moved, but downward and in order. The metals complex eased as a block, platinum, copper, nickel, aluminium and polyvinyl all lower, with bitumen and HRC the only risers. No spike, no disorder.
-
-
ICEI = 2 → up from 1, and the source of this week's increase. The Dirham firmed against all eight currencies, more movement than a typical week, though every bit of it favoured the buyer.
-
-
ELEI = 3 → the line carrying the score. Diesel held at AED 4.33/L and bulk freight fell (Baltic Dry down 7.48%), but container rates rose 6.02%, leaving logistics mixed and still the standout pressure.
-
Methodology of SPSI Calculation:
One weighted score from three sub-indices: Market Volatility (MVEI) at 45%, Import & Currency Exposure (ICEI) at 30%, and Energy & Logistics (ELEI) at 25%.
The weighting follows the cost structure of construction. Material prices drive the largest weekly swings and take the top weight, import currency exposure ranks second, freight and energy third.
This week: (MVEI 2 × 0.45) + (ICEI 2 × 0.30) + (ELEI 3 × 0.25) = 2.25 (Mild Risk).
Interpretation:
The score rose from 1.95 to 2.25, landing on the upper edge of Mild, one step below Moderate. The cause matters more than the number. Materials did not drive it, they softened. The increase came entirely from the currency line, where a busier week of FX movement lifted ICEI from 1 to 2, despite every move running in the buyer's favour. In other words, the index ticked up on activity, not on cost pain.
Buying conditions stay comfortable. Freight is the single item to track. Bulk shipping eased this week but containers climbed, and the container line is the one that reaches imported steel and finishes. A sustained run higher in container rates is the path into Moderate territory, nothing else on the board points that way yet. Routine checks on the Baltic indices, LME inventories and AED cross rates will surface it in good time.
Procurement Recommendation
1. Material Procurement: The metals pullback is an opening, not a warning. Copper, aluminium and nickel are cheaper this week, a clean window to lock MEP, electrical and facade scopes. Bitumen is the exception, firm and top riser for a second week, so cover roads and waterproofing early. Steel is split, rebar softer and HRC firmer, so hold structural budgets level.
2. Currency & Import Strategy: All eight currencies eased against the Dirham, so every import is marginally cheaper, the Australian Dollar, Singapore Dollar and Euro most of all. Time new orders in those currencies to this week. The Yuan moved least but matters most, since it prices China-sourced materials. Apply it to fresh quotes only and leave signed contracts untouched.
3. Energy and Logistics Cost Management: Diesel unchanged at AED 4.33/L, so plant and haulage are flat. Freight is the split signal: bulk eased, helping imported steel and masonry slightly, while container rates jumped 6.02% with no softening in sight. Lock container freight on upcoming imported coil and finishes now, and weigh selective USD-linked forward positions on metals for Q3 buying.
4. Continuous Monitoring: Track the Baltic Exchange shipping indices, LME copper, nickel and platinum inventories, and the AED-EUR/GBP cross rates to catch any sustained escalation early.
MATERIALS BASKET COMPOSITION
Hover any wedge for material name and basket share.
Source: Stonehaven Cost Index Issue 16 · 04–11 May 2026
STEEL COMPLEX PRICE TREND
Click a tab to view that input — Rebar, HRC or CRC. Prices in USD per tonne, weekly.
Source: Stonehaven Cost Index Issue 19 · 01 June–08 June 2026
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR MATERIAL PURCHASING
Procurement signal across the construction materials basket — monitor, delay, or buy now.
Source: Stonehaven Cost Index Issue 19 · 01 June–08 June 2026
Commercial Guidance
1. Structural & Metal-Based Packages
The pressure came off the metals this week. Copper eased 4.23%, nickel 3.70% and aluminium 3.58%, while steel-rebar slipped 1.76% to 463.12 USD/t. The softening is broad across the non-ferrous complex rather than concentrated in any one line.
Flat steel went the other way. Hot-Rolled Coil firmed 0.34% to 1,192.05 USD/t and Cold-Rolled Coil held flat at 593.03 USD/t, so the structural frame sits steady to marginally cheaper, with the divergence between long and flat products still the story to watch.
Bitumen is the exception on the upside, firmer by 2.00% and top riser for a second week. The read for buyers has inverted from recent cycles: the metals that have just corrected offer a short buying window, while bitumen is the one line that still warrants forward cover.
2. Industrial, Commercial & Infrastructure Projects
Demand across the data centre, logistics and infrastructure pipeline stays firm, so the metals pullback reads as a positioning unwind rather than a demand event. That makes this a tactical moment to call off against framework agreements on copper, aluminium and nickel-linked scopes while the softer levels hold.
Freight is the mixed signal this week. Bulk eased sharply, with the Baltic Dry down 7.48%, Capesize 10.97% and Panamax 4.61%, which trims the landed premium on bulk long steel. Container freight moved the other way, up 6.02%, so coil and containerised long-lead items still carry rising delivered cost.
For projects with heavy container-sensitive content, landed-cost contingencies should be held or reviewed upward. Diesel is unchanged at AED 4.33/L on the June schedule, so haulage and plant-running costs are steady, and the dirham firmed across the basket, giving a small benefit on foreign-currency imports.
3. MEP, Finishes & Specialist Imports
The fall in copper (down 4.23%) and nickel (down 3.70%) opens a value window across MEP cabling, switchgear, busbar and specialist equipment. Polyvinyl eased 4.97% as well, supporting prompt positioning on pipework, conduit and waterproof membrane packages, and it is one of the two lines the workbook flags as a clear buy this cycle.
Bitumen at up 2.00% is the standout riser and still warrants forward cover on roads, asphalt and bituminous membrane scopes. Platinum fell hardest at 8.91%, the second flagged buy, though its direct construction exposure is limited, so treat it as value capture on platinum-linked specialist items rather than a budget driver.
In short: use the softened metals and polyvinyl for value now, hold forward cover on bitumen, and keep container freight priced into every imported MEP and finishes line.
Procurement Strategy
A selective, timing-based approach fits the cycle ending 08 June 2026. The broad pullback in copper, nickel, aluminium and polyvinyl argues for opportunistic call-off against existing framework agreements on MEP, electrical and facade packages while prices have corrected, and for timing rebar-led substructure scopes into the same soft patch.
Forward cover remains warranted on bitumen, where momentum is still upward, and on flat and coated steel, where the trend and freight exposure both point up. Steel-rebar, CRC, lead and titanium movements sit within normal volatility tolerance and can stay under active monitoring.
Container freight remains the principal embedded cost amplifier and should be priced explicitly into landed-cost estimates rather than absorbed in general inflation contingencies. The easing in bulk freight offers a partial offset on long-steel imports, but does not extend to containerised inputs.
Overall Commercial Position
Construction cost risk stays controlled and execution-driven. The 1.36% weekly fall in the SCI is a genuine materials move this week, driven by an orderly pullback across the non-ferrous and precious complex, not a mechanical effect, and it leaves the index 23.98% above its September 2025 baseline.
Bitumen firmness still warrants attention on roads and waterproofing scopes, while the corrected metals offer a tactical buying window on MEP and facade packages. Container freight continues to add embedded landed-cost pressure on imported coil and finishes, with the easing in bulk shipping a partial offset on long steel.
The current SPSI reading of 2.25 (Mild Risk) sits at the top of the Mild band, one step short of Moderate. The increase this cycle came from the currency line rather than from cost pain, with freight, specifically the container index, the principal watch item heading into the next cycle.
Important Disclaimer
The Stonehaven Cost Index (SCI) is for general information only and is not a commitment, guarantee, or offer to contract at any price. The index is based on publicly available commodity data and our internal market view as of 08 June 2026. Actual project costs depend on the specific scope, how you procure, and what's agreed commercially.
Stonehaven Project Management Services LLC accepts no liability for any loss caused by relying on this document without proper project-specific advice. The index shows general market movement based on weighted construction inputs.
Selected data points this cycle reflect manual review pending: the Plant Index is held flat at 153.36 with UAE diesel unchanged at AED 4.33/L on the June schedule, and Cold-Rolled Coil is held at 593.03 USD/t for series continuity as the primary source was unavailable, with alternative sources confirming a soft bias. Certain Baltic shipping benchmarks (Capesize, Panamax) may include proportional estimation. These items will be refreshed once full source confirmation is received.
FAQ's
1. What is the Stonehaven Construction Cost Index and how is it calculated?
The Stonehaven Cost Index (SCI) tracks weekly price movements across key construction materials, freight indices, and currency pairs relevant to the UAE and Saudi Arabia. Data is collected every week and reviewed by Stonehaven's cost management team before publication. The index is indicative and does not constitute a tender price or contractual valuation.
2. What affects construction material prices in the Middle East?
Several factors influence construction material prices in the Middle East, including global commodity markets, shipping costs, fuel prices and currency movements. Materials like steel, copper and bitumen are particularly sensitive to international demand and logistics conditions, which directly impact construction cost trends in the GCC.
3. How often do construction material prices change?
Construction material prices can change daily depending on global market conditions. Factors such as commodity prices, shipping costs and fuel rates influence short-term movements, which is why tracking weekly construction material price updates is important for sensitive cost planning.
4. How is the Stonehaven Construction Cost Index prepared?
The construction cost index is prepared using weekly data collection across key materials, currencies and freight rates. Cost managers monitor these movements to reflect current conditions. This is then reviewed by the commercial management alongside foreign exchange and logistics trends, which influence construction pricing across the GCC before presenting to our readers.
Check Out Our Previous Issues
Talk To Our Team
Speak to our cost management specialists to benchmark, forecast, and protect your project margins, using real data from the Stonehaven Cost Index.