Stonehaven Services

No Results Found

Issue 20.jpg
Share Article


This Week’s Cost Intelligence

 

After last week’s broad pull-back, the index settled rather than fell away, easing just 0.34% to 123.56. That is the third week running it has slipped, but each step has been smaller than the last, so this reads as gentle drift rather than decline, and it still sits 23.56% above the September baseline.

 

What changed this week is the shape of the move. Instead of everything softening together, the metals split, with a handful firming while others gave up ground, so the picture is a market finding its level rather than one heading anywhere in particular.

 

The values this week are starting to read with a clearer split. Copper is up 3.76% remaining firmer, so anything copper-heavy on the electrical and MEP side is the line to watch and to commit early before it carries further. Against that, aluminium fell hardest at 6.19% which takes a little pressure off cladding. 

 

Two outside forces still work against the softer lines. Freight is the larger one, with container rates jumping sharply this month and the dry-bulk indices holding firm, so a lower mill price does not carry through to a lower delivered price, price every imported line on landed cost.

Currency has turned as well. Where the Dirham and Riyal firmed last week, this week they eased against every tracked currency, with Sterling, the Singapore Dollar and the Euro firming most, which adds a small amount to foreign-currency imports across the board. The US Dollar stays pegged and does not move against either, so dollar-denominated buys are unaffected.

 

Ready to Receive Stonehaven's Cost Index?

STONEHAVEN COST INDEX HEADLINE KPIS

SCI Issue 20 · 08 June–15 June 2026

Stonehaven
Cost Index
0.00 As of 15 June 2026
Weekly 0.00% vs 08 June 2026
vs Baseline 0.00% Since 01 Sep 2025 = 100
Top Riser (WoW) COPPER 0.00%
Top Faller (WoW) ALUMINIUM 0.00%

Source: Stonehaven Cost Index Issue 20 · 08 June–15 June 2026

SCI VS BASELINE — 34-WEEK TREND

Stonehaven Cost Index, weekly. Baseline 01 Sep 2025 = 100.

Source: Stonehaven Cost Index Issue 20 · 08 June–15 June 2026

SCI WEEK-ON-WEEK % CHANGE

Weekly movement of the Stonehaven Cost Index — momentum over the last 34 readings.

Source: Stonehaven Cost Index Issue 20 · 08 June–15 June 2026

THIS WEEK'S DRIVER NOTE

Commercial commentary on the week's price action from Stonehaven's Managing Director.

THIS WEEK'S
DRIVER NOTE

The index eases to 123.56, down 0.34%. That is a third soft week, but each fall is smaller than the last. This is the market settling, not turning.

The metals split this week rather than moving as one. Copper led the risers, up 3.76%, while aluminium fell hardest at 6.19%. Steel and the structural frame held firm.

Use the softer base metals to lock cladding and MEP scopes now. Watch copper, it is the one still climbing. Freight is rising again, so price every import on landed cost.

GORDON RODGER
MANAGING DIRECTOR
Gordon Rodger, Managing Director

Source: Stonehaven Cost Index Issue 20 · 08 June–15 June 2026

MATERIAL MOVEMENT THIS WEEK

Spot prices and % change across weekly, monthly, year-to-date and year-on-year windows.

MATERIAL
PRICE
UNITS
WEEKLY
MONTHLY
% YTD
% YOY

← Swipe or tap arrows to see more →

Source: Stonehaven Cost Index Issue 20 · 08 June–15 June 2026

To view the price fluctuations in detail, please download our latest dataset below.

CUMULATIVE % CHANGE VS BASELINE BY MATERIAL

How far each tracked input has moved since 01 Sep 2025 = 100.

Source: Stonehaven Cost Index Issue 20 · 08 June–15 June 2026

MARKET MATERIAL WATCHLIST

Three materials to monitor closely over the coming week.

COPPER Increase (▲)
ALUMINIUM Decrease (▼)
STEEL & DIESEL Firm to Flat (—)

Source: Stonehaven Cost Index Issue 20 · 08 June–15 June 2026

Copper – Increase (▲)

 

Forecast:  Copper rebounded 3.76% this week, all but reversing last week's fall, with LME/COMEX strength backed by a 3.70% monthly gain and persistent electrification and data centre pull. With inventories tight and the structural demand story intact, the line should hold its firmer footing into the coming week.

Action:  lock forward cover on cabling, busbar and MEP packages now, before the next leg higher prices in.

 

Aluminium – Decrease (▼)

 

Forecast: Aluminium led the basket lower at 6.19%, extending a 5.28% monthly slide as LME and SHFE both softened on ample supply and cooler positioning. With no clear floor yet in place, the line is likely to drift lower or stabilise rather than recover next week.

Action: delay non-urgent commitments on cladding, curtain walling and façade scopes to capture the correction, whilst keeping a watch for the first sign of a base.

 

Steel & Diesel – Firm to flat (—)

 

Forecast:  Rebar edged up 0.33% and HRC firmed 0.67% on steadier Chinese mill signals, while diesel is held at AED 4.33/L and SAR 1.79/L on the June schedule, keeping the Plant line flat. China's 2026 steel export-quota regime remains the structural wildcard for coil.

Action:  Cover coil and coated steel, and time rebar purchases opportunistically. Cold-rolled coil has remained steady at USD 593/t for several consecutive series.

 

THIS WEEK'S MARKET MOVERS — WOW %

Material-by-material price movement over the week ending 15 June 2026.

Source: Stonehaven Cost Index Issue 20 · 08 June–15 June 2026

AVERAGE SCI FLUCTUATION
VS MATERIAL PRICES

Click a tab to switch material — Oil (Brent), Steel-rebar or Aluminium. Bars show monthly average material price (left axis); line shows Avg. SCI (right axis).

Source: Stonehaven Cost Index Issue 20 · 08 June–15 June 2026

SCI SUB-INDEX TRENDS

Click a tab to view that index — Materials, Labour or Plant.

Source: Stonehaven Cost Index Issue 20 · 08 June–15 June 2026

 

Aluminium – The Gulf's Squeeze Comes Home

 

Aluminium carries a 10% weight in the Stonehaven materials basket, the third-largest single line after rebar and copper, and it sits at the centre of every façade, curtain-wall, cladding, window and architectural-metal package across the GCC pipeline. This cycle it was the story.

The price corrected 6.19% to USD 3,375.65/t, the sharpest faller in the basket and the principal reason the Materials Index gave back ground. The move reads as a positioning unwind and a softer demand signal from Chinese downstream buyers rather than a structural shift, because the medium-term pull from Gulf construction, electrification and the regional data-centre build-out remains firm. For façade and cladding scopes, the correction opens a tactical buying window where programme cover is thin.

 

Step back from the week, though, and aluminium is still an expensive line. Even after the fall it indexes at 129.0 against the 01 September 2025 baseline of USD 2,617.40/t, it remains 11.66% higher year to date and 32.04% above where it stood a year ago. The 5.28% slide over the month is a retracement from elevated levels, not a return to cheap metal, which is exactly why the window is tactical rather than structural.

 

 

Aluminium - When the Exporter Becomes the Importer

 

 

The Gulf occupies an unusual position in the aluminium chain. The region is one of the world's largest primary producers, with Emirates Global Aluminium and Ma'aden between them casting several million tonnes a year. Yet the construction sector still imports the bulk of its extruded, anodised and powder-coated finished product from Asia and Europe.

 

That split is what matters for cost. The landed price of a façade package is set far less by the primary ingot than by conversion margins, energy tariffs, anti-dumping duties and freight. The current ingot correction will therefore feed through only partially and with a lag, and the firmer container-freight line is already working against it.

 

Freight is the mechanism that decides how much of the saving survives. Containers ran higher this week, with the Global Container Freight Index up 9.49% to 2,985.22, and finished aluminium product moves containerised, so the Red Sea and Suez routing premium eats directly into the ingot relief. Dry-bulk gave the opposite signal, the Baltic Dry Index easing 8.76% to 2,720 points, but that relief lands on bulk cargoes rather than on extruded and coated sections.

 

The procurement implication runs against the instinct to wait. The headline fall is a signal to lock extruded and coated-aluminium rates now, before conversion and shipping costs reclaim the saving. Aluminium is the most procurement-critical façade and cladding line in the basket, and the forward risk is skewed to the upside, so take cover on façade and architectural-metal packages where programme cover is thin, and treat any further ingot weakness as a chance to fix rates rather than a trend to ride down.

 

CURRENCY & INFLATION LENS

AED VS KEY TRADING CURRENCIES

UAE Dirham vs key trading currencies, weekly movement and trailing averages.

CURRENCY
AED VS
CURRENCY
OTHER CURRENCY
STRENGTH
WOW%
CHANGE
3 MONTH
AVERAGE
6 MONTH
AVERAGE

← Swipe or tap arrows to see more →

Source: Stonehaven Cost Index Issue 20 · 08 June–15 June 2026

AED FX EXPOSURE — WOW % CHANGE

Weekly currency moves against AED across the eight tracked import-pricing pairs.

Source: Stonehaven Cost Index Issue 20 · 08 June–15 June 2026

SAR VS KEY TRADING CURRENCIES

Saudi Riyal vs key trading currencies, weekly movement and trailing averages.

CURRENCY
SAR VS
CURRENCY
OTHER CURRENCY
STRENGTH
WOW%
CHANGE
3 MONTH
AVERAGE
6 MONTH
AVERAGE

← Swipe or tap arrows to see more →

Source: Stonehaven Cost Index Issue 20 · 08 June–15 June 2026

SAR FX EXPOSURE — WOW % CHANGE

Weekly currency moves against SAR across the eight tracked import-pricing pairs.

Source: Stonehaven Cost Index Issue 20 · 08 June–15 June 2026

Ready to Receive Stonehaven's Cost Index?

 

Currency Impact on This Week's Costs

 

Here is the short version. This week the Dirham and the Riyal eased a little against everything we follow, so your money now stretches that bit less on anything bought abroad. Every imported package priced in a foreign currency is a touch dearer than it was last week, and the move was one-sided, nothing went the other way to offset it. The Dollar, of course, did not budge, it is tied to both currencies by law, so a job in the UAE and a job in Saudi Arabia are in exactly the same boat.

 

If you line the currencies up by how much they firmed against the Dirham and Riyal, it looks like this:

 

1. British Pound - up 0.82%, the biggest move, so UK consultants and facade systems cost a little more this week

 

2. Singapore Dollar - up 0.72%

 

3. Euro - up 0.61%, which adds a little to European steel and facade work

 

4. Australian Dollar - up 0.44%

 

5. Japanese Yen - up 0.23%

 

6. Indian Rupee - up 0.22%

 

7. Chinese Yuan - up 0.20%. It moved the least, but keep an eye on it anyway, because it is the one that feeds into China-sourced bitumen, polyvinyl, rebar and cold-rolled coil

 

8. US Dollar - flat, as always, it is pegged

 

What This Means for Construction

 

Picture it as a small, even uplift sitting on top of every imported package this week. It is not really a story about any one country, it just depends on what currency you happen to be paying in.

 

So if you are buying in Pounds, Singapore Dollars or Euros, the rise is big enough to be worth pricing into a new order this week, European steel and facade scopes being the obvious one. If you are paying in Australian Dollars, Yen, Rupees or Yuan, just note it as a small headwind, fold it into your next quote and move on, it is too small to start reshuffling suppliers over. The Yuan is the one worth a second glance even though it barely moved, simply because it quietly lifts the landed cost of the China-linked materials the index follows.

 

Either way the advice is the same: build the small uplift into new orders, and leave anything already signed or covered exactly where it is. Nothing here is big enough to justify reopening a contract.

 

The Practical Read

 

A slightly softer week for buyers, but a gentle one. Everything imported is a little dearer, with the British Pound, Singapore Dollar and Euro leading the way. It is a modest move and it could just as easily reverse if the Dollar firms, so price it into new orders without over-reacting. And since the Dirham and Riyal are joined at the hip through the Dollar, there is no advantage either side of the border, a UAE project and a Saudi one sit in precisely the same place.

 

GLOBAL INPUTS & FREIGHT BENCHMARKS

Logistics & freight — construction cost multipliers.

LOGISTICS & FREIGHT
POINT
WOW%
CHANGE
3 MONTH
AVERAGE
6 MONTH
AVERAGE

← Swipe or tap arrows to see more →

Source: Stonehaven Cost Index Issue 20 · 08 June–15 June 2026 · *Data as of 15 June 2026

FREIGHT & SHIPPING INDICES

Click a tab to view that index — Baltic Dry, Capesize, Panamax or Container. Monthly readings.

Source: Stonehaven Cost Index Issue 20 · 08 June–15 June 2026

 

Stonehaven Procurement Strategy Index (SPSI)

 

The SPSI scores procurement risk in one number, built from three inputs:

 

  • Market Volatility (MVEI) – the size of material price moves

  •  

  • Import & Currency Exposure (ICEI) – the cost effect of currency swings on imports

  •  

  • Energy & Logistics (ELEI) – the pressure from fuel and freight

Each runs 1 to 4, from calm to high risk. The combined score uses the same scale:

 

  • Below 1.5: Low risk – steady market, minimal movement

  •  

  • 1.5 to 2.25: Mild risk – small moves, light monitoring

  •  

  • 2.25 to 3.25: Moderate risk – clear movement, targeted action

  •  

  • Above 3.25: High risk – unsettled market, immediate review

  •  

Current Position (15 June): SPSI = 1.95 (Mild Risk, mid-band)

 

  • MVEI = 2 → mild material price volatility. The basket was two-sided this cycle, a sharp aluminium and bitumen correction set against firmer copper and steady steel flats. The dispersion is wide but offsetting, which keeps volatility in the mild band rather than signalling disorderly moves.

  •  

  • ICEI = 1 → low import and currency exposure. The Dirham eased only marginally across the basket and the weekly FX moves were small, so the currency channel sits at the low end this cycle, even as the structural reliance on imported metals and coil persists.

  •  

  • ELEI = 3 → the line carrying the score. Diesel held at AED 4.33/L and the Baltic Dry Index fell sharply (down 8.76%), but container freight firmed 9.49% and the Red Sea corridor remains a live risk, leaving energy and logistics the dominant contributor to the composite.

  •  

Methodology of SPSI Calculation:

 

One weighted score from three sub-indices: Market Volatility (MVEI) at 45%, Import & Currency Exposure (ICEI) at 30%, and Energy & Logistics (ELEI) at 25%.

 

The weighting follows the cost structure of construction. Material prices drive the largest weekly swings and take the top weight, import currency exposure ranks second, freight and energy third.

 

This week: (MVEI 2 × 0.45) + (ICEI 1 × 0.30) + (ELEI 3 × 0.25) = 1.95 (Mild Risk).

 

Interpretation:

 

The composite holds at 1.95, the third consecutive week at this level and unchanged from both 08 June and 01 June, with each sub-score (MVEI 2, ICEI 1, ELEI 3) also flat week-on-week. The reading sits in the middle of the Mild band, a clear margin below the 2.25 Moderate threshold. The stability reflects a settled balance, contained material-price volatility and low currency exposure on one side, a persistently elevated logistics line on the other as container freight stays firm. The signal is that headline procurement risk is steady rather than improving or deteriorating.

 

Buying conditions stay comfortable, and freight is the single item to track. Bulk shipping eased hard this week but containers climbed, and the container line is the one that reaches imported steel and finishes. A sustained run higher in container rates is the path into Moderate territory, nothing else on the board points that way yet. Routine checks on the Baltic indices, LME inventories and AED cross rates will surface it in good time.

 

Procurement Recommendation

 

1. Material Procurement: The metals correction is an opening, not a warning. Aluminium, bitumen and nickel are cheaper this week, a clean window to take forward cover on facade aluminium and stainless-linked nickel where programme cover is thin. Copper is the exception, firmer this week, so lock it for MEP and busbar scopes before it runs further. Steel is firm and split, rebar and HRC both edged up, so hold flat-steel and coated-steel commitments against the China export-quota risk.

 

2. Currency & Import Strategy: All eight currencies firmed marginally against the Dirham this week, so every import is fractionally dearer, the Pound, Singapore Dollar and Euro most of all. Settle imminent euro, sterling and yuan commitments sooner rather than later, recognising the peg caps the size of the move. Apply the shift to fresh quotes only and leave signed contracts untouched.

 

3. Energy and Logistics Cost Management: Diesel unchanged at AED 4.33/L and SAR 1.79/L, so plant and haulage are flat. Freight is the split signal: dry-bulk eased sharply, helping imported steel and masonry, while container rates jumped 9.49% with no softening in sight. Lock container space and shipping windows early on import-heavy coil and finishes, time bulk-cargo deliveries into the softer dry-bulk market, and weigh selective USD-linked forward positions on metals for Q3 buying.

 

4. Continuous Monitoring: Track the Baltic Exchange shipping indices, LME copper, nickel and platinum inventories, and the AED-EUR/GBP cross rates to catch any sustained escalation early.

 

MATERIALS BASKET COMPOSITION

Hover any wedge for material name and basket share.

Source: Stonehaven Cost Index Issue 16 · 04–11 May 2026

STEEL COMPLEX PRICE TREND

Click a tab to view that input — Rebar, HRC or CRC. Prices in USD per tonne, weekly.

Source: Stonehaven Cost Index Issue 20 · 08 June–15 June 2026

RECOMMENDATIONS FOR MATERIAL PURCHASING

Procurement signal across the construction materials basket — monitor, delay, or buy now.

MATERIAL
CAUTION SIGNAL
PROCUREMENT RECOMMENDATION
Delay Monitor Buy Now

Source: Stonehaven Cost Index Issue 20 · 08 June–15 June 2026

Ready to Receive Stonehaven's Cost Index?

 

Commercial Guidance

 

1. Structural & Metal-Based Packages

 

The non-ferrous complex rotated this week rather than moving as a block. Copper firmed 3.76% to 14.29 USD/kg on grid and electrification demand, while aluminium corrected 6.19% to 3,375.65 USD/t and nickel eased 3.92% to 17,815 USD/t. Steel-rebar edged up 0.33% to 464.65 USD/t, so the long-product line firmed alongside copper rather than with the fallers.

 

Flat steel held its firmer tone. Hot-Rolled Coil rose 0.67% to 1,200.00 USD/t and Cold-Rolled Coil was held flat at 593.03 USD/t for series continuity, so the structural frame sits steady to marginally firmer, with the long-versus-flat divergence still the line to watch against the China export-quota risk.

 

Bitumen reversed last week's strength, falling 6.12% to 633.82 USD/t. The read for buyers is two-sided: aluminium, bitumen and nickel have just corrected and offer a short buying window, while copper and the coil complex are firm and warrant forward cover where the trend points up.

 

2. Industrial, Commercial & Infrastructure Projects

 

Demand across the data centre, logistics and infrastructure pipeline stays firm, so the aluminium and nickel pullback reads as a positioning unwind rather than a demand event. That makes this a tactical moment to call off against framework agreements on aluminium and nickel-linked scopes while the softer levels hold, and to lock copper where cover is thin before it runs further.

 

Freight is the mixed signal this week. Dry-bulk eased sharply, with the Baltic Dry down 8.76% and Capesize 17.17%, though Panamax firmed 2.46%, which broadly trims the landed premium on bulk long steel. Container freight moved the other way, up 9.49%, so coil and containerised long-lead items still carry rising delivered cost.

 

For projects with heavy container-sensitive content, landed-cost contingencies should be held or reviewed upward. Diesel is unchanged at AED 4.33/L and 1.79/L on the June schedule, so haulage and plant-running costs are steady, while the dirham softened marginally across the basket, a small headwind on foreign-currency imports that the peg keeps contained.

 

3. MEP, Finishes & Specialist Imports

 

Copper firmed this week, up 3.76%, so the MEP cabling, switchgear and busbar lines call for locking forward cover now rather than waiting, before the next leg prices in. Nickel, down 3.92%, opens a clearer value window on stainless and specialist alloy packages and is one of the lines the workbook flags as a buy this cycle. Polyvinyl was effectively flat and sits under monitoring rather than as a clear buy.

 

Aluminium, down 6.19%, is the standout correction and the second flagged buy, a tactical window on facade, cladding and architectural-metal scopes where programme cover is thin. Lead, down 1.77%, is the third flagged buy, useful for cable and battery-linked items. Bitumen at down 6.12% has corrected hard but the forecast is for it to stabilise rather than extend, so treat committed roads and waterproofing cover as a hold-and-top-up rather than a fresh chase.

 

In short: use the corrected aluminium, nickel and lead for value now, lock copper and coil where the trend is up, hold existing bitumen cover, and keep container freight priced into every imported MEP and finishes line.

 

Procurement Strategy

 

A selective, timing-based approach fits the cycle ending 15 June 2026. The correction in aluminium, bitumen and nickel argues for opportunistic call-off against existing framework agreements on facade, stainless and waterproofing packages while prices have fallen, set against firmer copper and steel flats that warrant retained cover.

 

Forward cover remains warranted on copper, where the tone is firm, and on flat and coated steel, where the trend and the China export-quota risk both point up. Steel-rebar, CRC, lead and titanium movements sit within normal volatility tolerance and can stay under active monitoring.

 

Container freight remains the principal embedded cost amplifier and should be priced explicitly into landed-cost estimates rather than absorbed in general inflation contingencies. The sharp easing in dry-bulk freight offers a partial offset on long-steel imports, but does not extend to containerised inputs.

 

Overall Commercial Position

 

Construction cost risk stays controlled and is broadly easing this cycle, but its composition is shifting towards logistics. The 0.34% weekly fall in the SCI is a genuine materials move, driven by a rotating non-ferrous basket rather than a mechanical effect, with energy and labour stable and FX a marginal headwind, and it leaves the index 23.56% above its September 2025 baseline.

 

The corrected metals offer a tactical buying window on facade and stainless packages, while copper and flat steel warrant retained cover. Container freight continues to add embedded landed-cost pressure on imported coil and finishes, with the sharp easing in dry-bulk shipping a partial offset on long steel.

 

The current SPSI reading of 1.95 (Mild Risk) sits in the middle of the Mild band, a clear margin short of Moderate, and is unchanged for a third consecutive week. Material volatility and import exposure are both contained, leaving freight, specifically the container index, the principal watch item heading into the next cycle.

 

 

Important Disclaimer

 

The Stonehaven Cost Index (SCI) is for general information only and is not a commitment, guarantee, or offer to contract at any price. The index is based on publicly available commodity data and our internal market view as of 15 June 2026. Actual project costs depend on the specific scope, how you procure, and what's agreed commercially.

 

Stonehaven Project Management Services LLC accepts no liability for any loss caused by relying on this document without proper project-specific advice. The index shows general market movement based on weighted construction inputs.

 

Selected data points this cycle reflect manual review pending: the Plant Index is held flat at 153.36 with UAE diesel unchanged at AED 4.33/L on the June schedule, and Cold-Rolled Coil is held at 593.03 USD/t for series continuity as the primary source was unavailable, with alternative sources confirming a soft bias. Certain Baltic shipping benchmarks (Capesize, Panamax) may include proportional estimation. These items will be refreshed once full source confirmation is received.

 

FAQ's

 

1. What is the Stonehaven Construction Cost Index and how is it calculated?

 

The Stonehaven Cost Index (SCI) tracks weekly price movements across key construction materials, freight indices, and currency pairs relevant to the UAE and Saudi Arabia. Data is collected every week and reviewed by Stonehaven's cost management team before publication. The index is indicative and does not constitute a tender price or contractual valuation.

 

2. What affects construction material prices in the Middle East?

 

Several factors influence construction material prices in the Middle East, including global commodity markets, shipping costs, fuel prices and currency movements. Materials like steel, copper and bitumen are particularly sensitive to international demand and logistics conditions, which directly impact construction cost trends in the GCC.

 

3. How often do construction material prices change?

 

Construction material prices can change daily depending on global market conditions. Factors such as commodity prices, shipping costs and fuel rates influence short-term movements, which is why tracking weekly construction material price updates is important for sensitive cost planning.

 

4. How is the Stonehaven Construction Cost Index prepared?

 

The construction cost index is prepared using weekly data collection across key materials, currencies and freight rates. Cost managers monitor these movements to reflect current conditions. This is then reviewed by the commercial management alongside foreign exchange and logistics trends, which influence construction pricing across the GCC before presenting to our readers.

 

Check Out Our Previous Issues

Stonehaven Cost Index Previous Issue

Talk To Our Team

 

Speak to our cost management specialists to benchmark, forecast, and protect your project margins, using real data from the Stonehaven Cost Index.

 

For better web experience, please use the website in portrait mode

VIEW